ding reyes books
|
Foreword 'Reliving the Kamalaysayan Imperative By
Prof. Bernard LM. Karganilla Chairperson,
Kamalaysayan
(Kaisahan sa Kamalayan sa Kasaysayan) (Solidarity
on Sense of History) Immediate-past
Chairperson, Social Sciences Department, University
of the Philippines Manila "Si
Koronel Bonzon ang bumaril ng rebolber kay G. Andres Bonifacio na
ipinagkasugat nito sa kaliwang bisig. Dumaluhong din noon si Koronel
Pawa kay G. Andres Bonifacio at ito’y sinaksak ng sundang sa gawing
kanan ng liig. Nang anyong bibigyan ulit ng isa pang saksak si G.
Bonifacio ay siyang pagdaluhong kay Pawa ni G. Alejandro Santiago na
nagsabing: ‘Ako ang patayin ninyo, huwag iyan!’ Noon din ay inilagay
si G. Andres Bonifacio sa isang duyan at dinalang bihag sa Indang.” Thus
did General Artemio Ricarte testify to the tragic fate of Gat Andres
Bonifacio, the first Pangulo of our Republic (the Haringbayang
Katagalugan). Ricarte’s
narration, found on page 71 of his Himagsikan ng mga Pilipino
laban sa Kastila, published in 1927 in Yokohama (Japan), is only
one source on the maltreatment of President Bonifacio. There are more. 1.
“The execution of Andres Bonifacio, carried out in an
atmosphere of intrigue, was a glaring evidence of the abnormal
psychology that pervaded the revolutionists toward the close of the
first epoch of the national struggle for emancipation.” [Agoncillo,
Teodoro A. “The Summing Up.” Revolt of the Masses: The Story of
Bonifacio and the Katipunan (Quezon City: University of the Philippines
Press, 2002 [1956]), pp. 278-315] 2.
“There were dark forces at work. After Christmas that year
(1896) anti-Bonifacio gossip and poison pen letters were circulating,
some saying that he had poor schooling. Daniel Tirona, a Magdalo, was
suspected as one of the letter writers.” [Corpuz, O. D. The Roots of
the Filipino Nation, Vol. II. Quezon City: AKLAHI Foundation, Inc.,
1989, pp. 211-19, 243-55] 3.
“The bigger tragedy is that nearly 100 years later, the
government, historians, and descendants of the two revolutionary
factions, Magdiwang and Magdalo, still cannot confront the truth of this
dark episode.” [Joel C. Paredes, Director General of the Philippine
Information Agency, “Lighting the dark side of the revolution in
Cavite: A RIGGED ELECTION, A SALVAGING,” [Reprinted from Today,
January 10, 1996, www.pia.gov.ph/philtoday/pt03/pt0307.htm] President
Bonifacio, a co-founder of the Katipunan, was treacherously kidnapped,
rammed through a mistrial, and covertly murdered. The
perpetrators are on record, the mastermind in history books. But
the whole truth of President Bonifacio’s unjust execution has been
encased in mud by the executioners and their partisans. Can
this mystery be fully exposed? Yes,
if the current President can summon the moral courage to convene a Truth
Commission for his foremost and primeval predecessor. BENIGNO
SIMEON AQUINO III created the Philippine Truth Commission of 2010
because “there is an urgent call for the determination of the truth
regarding certain reports of large scale graft and corruption in the
government and to put a closure to them by the filing of the appropriate
cases against those involved.” [EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 1] How
about a Truth, Reconciliation and Historical Commission for President
Bonifacio? Such
a proposal reflects the essence of the Kamalaysayan Imperative. History
may have a Muse of its own as well as its camp followers. All well and
as should be. But
for non-historians, Clio* is a non-entity. Thus, the average Filipino
concentrates on the present with nary a thought for the future or the
past. What is history for? In
the Kamalaysayan Imperative, the greatest possible space is allotted for
the novice, i.e., the casual reader, the TV channel surfer, the chat
room stalker, the corner store regular, the window shopper. Who likes
history? With
the Kamalaysayan Imperative, the expert and the activist not only join
hands but even extend the hoopla to the vintage car collector, the
antique dealer, the hobbyist and the cosplayer. When is history
relevant? Every
day is a possible game-changer. Through the Kamalaysayan Imperative, the
Filipino is reminded that anniversaries, holidays and other special
occasions are enjoyed more fully when the reasons for their observance
are respected and shared. The
Kamalaysayan Imperative is here to stay. __________ *In Greek mythology, Clio or Kleio, is the muse of history. _________________________________________________________ Gratitude & Dedication Author's Acknowledgment and Dedication (from 1st Edition) By Prof. Ed Aurelio C. Reyes We grew the very idea of sense of history, as our beloved nation urgently needs it, with our expanding synergy of insights, researched information and dedication. In 2001, the Lambat-Liwanag Network made the crucial addition of 'collective sense of mission' as part of that imperative, and the Kamalaysayan credo grew much wider and deeper. That, as a product of collective wisdom, is the very pillar of all the contents of this book. These people are all my co-authors here! To
all who have contributed to this synthesis process, and to efforts to
put this in one book, the author is forever grateful. This
work is lovingly dedicated to generations within families, where the
parents support the aspirations of their children for the latter's own
time and circumstantial contexts, and where the latter gratefully value
their parents' and grandparents' dreams and struggles, also properly
understood and appreciated in their equivalent contexts.
And it is dedicated, as well, to all the people of various generations, who would exert constructive efforts to clearly forge the synergy of our nation along with all past, present and future chapters of the fluvial flow of our history... where all its parts would make up one clear, deep and continuously flowing and gleaming River of Life. Finally,
my gratitude to the International Academy of Management and Economics
and its founder-Chairman-CEO Emmanuel “Noli” Tiu Santos, Ph. D., for
bankrolling the publication of this book.
Prof.
Ed Aurelio “Ding” C. Reyes
|